Shugo Maeda

Reported issues: 0

12:47 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #95: can we be clearer in the specs about , #: Jörg W Mittag wrote: > Note that it is _already_ pretty much a standard, and has been for quite some time. It's the standard convention in the YARV and MRI standard library documentation. It is also used in the documentation for pretty much every...

12:51 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #121 (Closed): Editorial: Rex Jaeschke wrote: > Ok. Thanks for your confirmation.
12:51 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #131 (Closed): Signed number: Rex Jaeschke wrote: > Ok. Thanks for your confirmation.

03:38 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #136 (Closed): Clarification: Rex Jaeschke wrote: > Ok. Thanks for your confirmation.
03:37 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #123 (Closed): Editorial: Rex Jaeschke wrote: > Yes, very good. Thanks for your confirmation.
03:36 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #121: Editorial: Shugo Maeda wrote: > Rex Jaeschke wrote: > > "The names of attributes are ..." Should this be moved to "Notational conventions"? > > We'll move it to "Notational conventions." Thank you. I have moved it to "Notationale conventions." Woul...
03:03 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #131: Signed number: Shugo Maeda wrote: > We'll fix the description because existing implementations separate the sequence a-2 into three tokens: a, -, and 2. > However, the sequence "a -2" is separated into two tokens: a and -2, and is interpreted as an invocation ...

07:10 PM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #130 (Closed): Operator syntax: I have added =, !, !=, !~, &&, and || to the operator production. Thank you.

11:16 AM Ruby Draft Specification Comment #117 (Closed): Clarification: term keyword: Rex Jaeschke wrote: > That's fine with me. I have fixed it. Thank you.

Also available in: Atom